Who Sold More Phones Apple Or Samsung


Apple vs. Samsung: Who makes the better phone?

Following the publication of a recent research by Gartner, it was discovered that Apple had surpassed Samsung to become the world’s leading smartphone manufacturer for the first time in five years. As I previously stated, this has been a peculiar calendar year for me, and I’m not sure whether thepandemichas has done anything unusual in terms of update cycles and purchase selections. Apple sold 69.5 million total smartphone devices in the fourth quarter of 2019, compared to Samsung’s 70.4 million.

Now, although this is a significant increase for Apple and a significant decrease for Samsung, it’s important to remember that, when all other smartphone manufacturers are included in the mix, worldwide smartphone sales declined by a total of 12.5 percent.

Gartner I’m not exactly clear what is causing Apple to make such a huge profit in this situation.

Additionally, we must consider the fact that other models, like as the iPhone SE, the iPhone XR, and the iPhone 11, continued to sell well at lower prices after the release of the iPhone 12 in September.

It’s obvious who sells the most phones, but who makes the greatest phones, and how can you find out?

Of course, determining what is “better” may be a very personal decision; what is better for me may not necessarily be better for you, depending on the use case and a variety of other factors, for example.

So, which company makes a better phone?

My colleagues at Jason Squared and I, as well as numerous other ZDNetwriters, have attempted to distill this comparison down to ten key performance indicators (KPIs) and grade the two organizations on how well they execute on those performance indicators on a scale of one to ten. A perfect score would be ten points for each indication, for a total score of one hundred and fifty points (which none received). In order to provide some background, we also assessed Google.

User Experience

Apple has a score of 7 whereas Samsung has a score of 7. (Tie) We could fight about this for the rest of the day because it is such a highly subjective issue. Cipriani and I both prefer iOS over Android. With One UI 3.0, Samsung, on the other hand, has made considerable advancements in terms of functionality. However, if we look at the growth of both mobile operating systems over the course of several years, it appears that Android and iOS are becoming increasingly comparable platforms from the standpoint of the user experience they provide.

This is because, while they both provide fantastic user experiences, I believe they both might benefit from some significant enhancement in various areas; they are both getting on in years.

Samsung does a good job of taking unmodified Android and enhancing it with its value-added features and applications. Pure Android receives a 6 since it is implemented on the Pixel in conjunction with Google’s platform upgrades.

Industrial Design and Product Durability

Apple has nine points while Samsung has nine points (Tie) Yes, once again, design is a matter of personal choice. Jason Cipriani is dissatisfied with how large Samsung is making the S21/Note20 series with the S21/Note20. If you’re looking for a smaller phone in Samsung’s portfolio, the firm has stripped key functionality from the bigger smartphones to accommodate your needs. While Apple announced four distinct iPhone 12 models, all of which have the same fundamental characteristics, with the exception of a slightly bigger sensor on the 12 Pro and an IBIS-stabilized primary camera sensor on the iPhone 12 Pro Max, the company released four different iPhone 11 models.

Given their product durability records in the past, I would say that both of these firms have performed below average in this regard – which is why I have been storing these items in OtterBoxes for so long.

However, I will continue to use instances until someone can demonstrate to me that they are unbreakable.

Product Performance

Apple has a score of 9 whereas Samsung has an 8 There’s no getting around it: Apple’s A14 Bionic outperforms Samsung’s S20 in terms of overall chip performance as well as benchmarks done towards the end of last year utilizing the Qualcomm 865+ on the latter’s device. It outperformed it in every imaginable area that could be evaluated quantitatively. As of right now, Samsung is using Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoCs for S21 handsets in the North American market, which are quicker in several raw benchmark areas than the A14, such as memory bandwidth, according to the company.

  • The A14 Bionic, on the other hand, is connected with an older X55 modem processor from Qualcomm, and its data communications pipeline must pass via interconnects in order to function properly.
  • Regarding CPU core performance, the Snapdragon 888 is an octa-core processor with eight cores, whereas the A14 Bionic has six cores (6).
  • The A14 Bionic has greater Tier 3 cache than the Snapdragon, with 8MB compared to the Snapdragon’s 4MB.
  • Apple’s semiconductors are highly optimized for the platform on which they are used.
  • Samsung is now in the lead in displays due to the fact that this is where the company has decided to focus a substantial portion of its research and development resources, and it continues to operate the world’s second-largest display manufacturing industry.
  • High-frequency adaptive refresh displays, on the other hand, take significantly more power, which is why the S21 has a significantly larger battery capacity -4000mAh compared to the iPhone 12’s 2800mAh.
  • In addition, the firm makes foldable screens, which are utilized in the Samsung’s most costly Galaxy Z range of smartphones.

And this is due to the fact that Android is just more resource-intensive than Apple’s iOS. As a result, Apple receives a score of 9 and Samsung receives an 8.

Supply Chain Integration

Apple receives an 8 while Samsung receives a 10. Even though Apple receives high praise for its supply chain management and component sourcing, not to mention the fact that it is a chip designer in its own right, the company is no match for Samsung, which even relies on Samsung to supply parts for its products, which include things such as OLED displays, NAND flash, and DRAM. Samsung, on the other hand, is a formidable competitor. Furthermore, while Samsung utilizes Qualcomm Snapdragon chips in its phones, the company also manufactures such chips for Qualcomm, including the newest 888 chip.

Apple is exceptionally good in this area, earning an 8 out of 10, whilst Samsung earns a 10 from the same source.

Native Services and App Ecosystem

Apple has nine points while Samsung has six points. When it comes to the local ecosystem, Apple completely outperforms its competitor Samsung. Samsung is forced to rely on Google for nearly everything in terms of applications and services. While Google receives an 8 for its ecosystem in terms of the breadth and quality of its service offerings on Android, Apple receives a 9 since I believe that its wearables services are far superior to what Google currently offers in this area. I feel that its music environment, gaming, and financial offers are all superior than those of its competitors.

Samsung will receive a 6, and even with that, I believe we are being nice.

Apple vs Samsung: Product Integration

Apple has nine points while Samsung has seven points. Apple’s magic lies in the ease with which all of its products integrate with one another, with the customer needing to do little, if anything, to make it all work. Products from Samsung range from refrigerators to dryers to phones and smartwatches, among other things. However, there always appears to be one or more things that are not functioning properly. Once again, I believe that this is due to a reliance on Google for Android and Chrome OS, as well as Microsoft for Windows.

With regard to how effectively Samsung’s products should be connected with one another, the company frequently looks to Apple for inspiration.

For the time being, I believe that Samsung’s wearables narrative with the Gear is superior than that of Google with WearOS, much alone Fitbit’s.

Samsung, on the other hand, continues to be ranked lower than Apple; it receives a 7 while Apple receives a 9. Despite Google’s underwhelming wearable ecosystem, the company makes up for it in other areas such as Chromecast and Home/Nest, earning an 8 from me.

Developer Ecosystem

Nine points for Apple | Seven points for Samsung The ease with which all of Apple’s products integrate with one another without the customer having to do much, if anything, to make it work is a big part of what makes Apple special. Products from Samsung range from refrigerators to dryers to phones to smartwatches and everything in between. However, there always appears to be one or more things that aren’t quite right with the setup and operation. Another example of relying on Google for Android and Chrome OS, as well as on Microsoft for Windows, is what I believe is happening here.

With regard to how effectively Samsung’s products should be connected with one another, the company frequently looks to Apple for guidance.

For the time being, I believe that Samsung’s wearables narrative with the Gear is superior than Google’s with WearOS, much alone Fitbit’s.

The weak wearable ecosystem is offset by Google’s success in other areas, such as Chromecast and Home/Nest, which earns it an 8 rating from me.

End-User Support Infrastructure

Apple has nine points while Samsung has seven points. I don’t believe it is possible to truly compare the support provided by Apple and Samsung, much alone Apple’s support provided by every other Android device maker on the market, or even Google’s flagship Pixel smartphone. Apple has retail locations in almost every city in the world. Whenever you don’t have access to one, the company’s phone assistance is outstanding, its follow-through is superb, and it will ensure that your gadget is fixed by an approved service facility even when you are unable to get it repaired at an Apple store.

You might be interested:  How To Install Netflix On Samsung Smart Tv

As of August of last year, Google has just recently obtained commitments from key vendors, notably Samsung, to provide a three-year maintenance plan.

Apple receives a score of 9, while Samsung has a score of 7.

Platform Openness and Transparency

Nine points for Apple | Seven points for Samsung Apple and Samsung’s support, to say nothing of Apple’s support with that of every other Android device maker on the market, or even with that of Google’s flagship Pixel, are not fair comparisons, in my opinion. Nearly every major city has an Apple retail location. Whenever you don’t have access to one, the company’s phone assistance is fantastic, its follow-through is amazing, and it will ensure that your gadget is serviced by an approved service facility even when you are unable to have it repaired at an Apple store.

Only recently, in August of last year, did Google manage to get its vendors — including Samsung — to agree to a three-year maintenance plan.

Samsung has lately raised the ante by providing a fourth year of security and bug patches, but the two products are incomparably different in terms of features. A 9 is given to Apple, while a 7 is given to Samsung.

Platform Privacy and Security

Apple has nine points while Samsung has seven points. As simple as it was to proclaim Samsung the winner in terms of platform openness, it is equally simple to declare Apple the winner in terms of privacy and security. Yes, Samsung has Knox, which is a fantastic feature. Apple’s past record, as well as the fact that it doesn’t maintain many personal records or information on its customers, bodes well for its privacy initiatives in the future. Google, on the other hand, is interested in gathering as much information on us as it possibly can.

The Android ecosystem is rife with malware, vulnerabilities, and rogue actors, all of whom can be found on the Google Play Store.

I believe that Google has done a better job with privacy settings and security hardening on Android 11, hence it receives a 6 out of 10.

As a result of Cupertino’s heightened emphasis on privacy, which requires developers to ask for tracking consent with iOS 14.5, Apple receives a score of 9.


Apple received an 80 and Samsung received a 70. Accordingly, Apple has the highest overall score of 80, Samsung is second with a 70, and Google is third with a 68, respectively.

Apple Samsung Google
User Experience 7 7 6
Industrial DesignProduct Durability 9 9 7
Product Performance 9 8 7
Supply Chain Integration 8 10 6
Native ServicesApp Ecosystem 9 6 8
Product Integration 9 7 8
Developer Ecosystem 9 3 7
End-User Support Infrastructure 9 7 5
Platform OpennessTransparency 2 6 8
Platform PrivacySecurity 9 7 6
Score 80 70 68

We didn’t talk about Innovation or Customer Value because these are two concepts that are very subjective to each individual. Apple and Samsung, on the other hand, are both extremely inventive corporations that approach their innovation objectives in slightly different ways. Folding phones, display manufacturing, and display design are examples of what we see from Samsung, whereas Apple’s focus is on chip design, machine learning, wearable computing, and music. Customer value is determined by whether or not the service or product you are paying for is important to you.

To make it worthwhile, you must consider the overall value proposition of the ecosystem, as well as the use of other goods inside that ecosystem.

What do you think the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two titans are in these important areas?

Apple beats Samsung in phone sales for first time since 2016

  • The iPhone 12 Pro Max (on the left) and the iPhone 12 tiny (on the right) (right). Axon, Samuel
  • Axon, Samuel Axon Never allow it be stated that there aren’t a variety of size possibilities available at this time. Axon, Samuel
  • Et al.

According to a recent data study by research firm Gartner, Apple will surpass Samsung to become the world’s biggest seller of smartphones in the fourth quarter of 2020. Since the same quarter in 2016, Samsung has outsold Apple in terms of unit sales. The research firm Gartner predicts that Apple sold 79.94 million iPhones during the quarter, while Samsung sold 62.17 million iPhones. Samsung did not introduce any new flagship devices during that quarter. It was the debut of the new iPhone 12 series that fueled Apple’s sales, which in general outperformed the previous year’s iPhone improvements.

This success for Apple, on the other hand, came at a time when the smartphone market was experiencing a widespread slump.

According to Gartner’s Anshul Gupta, the lower rate of decline in the quarter compared to the rest of the year may be ascribed to “sales of more 5G smartphones and lower-to-mid-tier devices.” Samsung saw a 14.6% fall in global smartphone sales throughout 2020, yet the firm maintained its position as the year’s top seller, despite Apple’s fourth-quarter triumph against Samsung.

At the same time, Huawei, which has been struggling lately, saw its largest sales decline of the year.

According to Gupta, the introduction of 5G phones outside of China will be the driving force behind smartphone sales in 2021.

According to a report published earlier this month, the iPhone 12 mini sold far less copies than the iPhone 12 or even the iPhone 12 Pro, which is terrible news for those who prefer compact phones.

Nonetheless, several experts and leakers expect that the iPhone 13 small may be reintroduced later this year in the iPhone 13 lineup. Samuel Axon created the listing image.

Samsung sold almost twice as many phones as Apple in Q3, Gartner says

Because of the coronavirus pandemic, phone sales are expected to decline in 2020. Angela Lang is a contributor to CNET. According to an analyst group, Apple slid to the fourth place in terms of worldwide smartphone sales during the third quarter of 2020. According to a survey released on Monday, overall sales of smart phones globally during the third quarter totaled 366 million, a decrease of about 6 percent from the same period last year due to fewer individuals purchasing phones during the coronavirus epidemic.

  • Huawei sold 51.8 million smartphones, a decrease of more than 20% from the same quarter last year, while another Chinese smartphone vendorXiaomi sold 35% more units, a 35% increase from the same quarter last year.
  • More information may be found at: The greatest phone to buy in 2020.
  • Oppo rounded out the top five smartphone suppliers, with 29.9 million units sold, to complete the list.
  • Apple’s sales decline, on the other hand, was linked to the postponement of the launch of the 2020 iPhones.

Apple claims global smartphone market lead ahead of Samsung for first time since 2016

iPhone 12 Mini and iPhone 12 Pro Max are two new iPhones. Todd Haselton is a reporter at CNBC. According to statistics provided by market research firm Gartner on Monday, Apple delivered more smartphones than any other business during the fourth quarter of 2020. With roughly 80 million handsets supplied in the first quarter, the tech giant outperformed all other smartphone manufacturers, including Samsung. According to the survey, this is the first time Apple has been at the top of the smartphone market since 2016.

  1. Those brand-new smartphones weren’t even available for purchase for the whole period.
  2. According to a rival assessment from IDC issued last month, Apple delivered 90.1 million phones in the third quarter of 2014.
  3. Apple does not release unit sales figures for its products.
  4. The business said revenue from iPhones increased by 17 percent year over year in the fourth quarter of calendar 2020.
  5. According to Gartner, worldwide smartphone shipments would decline by 5.4 percent in 2020 as a result of the global coronavirus pandemic, but Apple’s unit sales will increase by 3.3 percent.
  6. With unit sales falling by 24.1 percent in 2020 as a result of U.S.

sanctions that have affected the Chinese smartphone maker’s handset business, Huawei had the worst reduction in shipments in 2020. According to Gartner, although Samsung does not facing the same challenges as Apple, the company’s shipments fell by 14.6 percent last year.

Apple overtook Samsung in smartphone sales for the first time in four years

According to Gartner, the popularity of the iPhone 12 resulted in Apple surpassing Samsung in smartphone sales in the fourth quarter of last year, marking the first time this has happened in four years. According to the market intelligence agency, Apple’s sales increased by 14.9 percent year on year, while Samsung’s sales decreased by 11.8 percent during the same period. According to Gartner, Apple’s sales increased by a more moderate 3.3 percent in total for the year 2020, while Samsung’s sales decreased by a more significant 14.6 percent.

  • Apple has beaten Samsung to reclaim the top place in the worldwide smartphone manufacturer rankings.
  • Samsung had a 14.6 percent year-on-year loss in 2020, but this did not prevent the company from maintaining its position as the world’s leading smartphone provider in the company’s full-year results.
  • Apple and Xiaomi were the only two smartphone providers in the top five list to see growth in 2020, with the other being Samsung.
  • According to Gartner, Inc., global sales of smartphones to end users decreased by 5.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2020.
  • Several factors, including increased sales of 5G smartphones and sales of cheaper to midrange smartphones, have mitigated the market drop in the fourth quarter of 2020, according to Gartner’s Anshul Gupta, senior research director.
  • Apple’s iPhone 12 sales would have been much greater if the company had been able to keep up with demand, but worldwide processor shortages hampered the company’s ability to do so.

Photo courtesy of Omid Arminon Unsplash FTC: We make use of auto-generating affiliate links that generate cash. More. More Apple news may be found on 9to5Mac’s YouTube channel:

About the Author

@benlovejoy Ben Lovejoy is a technology journalist from the United Kingdom who works as the EU Editor for 9to5Mac. He is well-known for his op-eds and diary articles, in which he explores his experience with Apple goods over time in order to provide a more comprehensive critique. He also writes fiction, having written two technothriller books, two science fiction short stories, and a romantic comedy!

Ben Lovejoy’s favorite gear

Xiaomi has surpassed Samsung as the world’s leading smartphone seller for the first time in the company’s history.

Xiaomi has topped global smartphone sales charts for the very first time, replacing Huawei as China’s most popular mobile phone OEM.

  • We are News18.com, and the most recent update was on August 5, 2021, 20:46 IST. FOLLOW US ON:

Xiaomi has apparently eclipsed Samsung in terms of worldwide phone sales, becoming the first company to accomplish so in the history of the world. Contrary to popular belief, according to market research firm Counterpoint, the Chinese business, which has been a long-time leader in the Indian smartphone industry, has led the worldwide phone sales charts for the month of June 2021. If the full second quarter of 2021 is taken into consideration, Xiaomi is still ranked second behind Samsung, according to its figures.

The Counterpoint research firm estimates that Xiaomi now dominates the worldwide smartphone sales charts, with a market share of 17.1 percent in June 2021.

Several market factors, including Samsung’s previously mentioned supply chain constraints, Huawei’s decline in prominence as a result of trade restrictions imposed by the United States, and Xiaomi’s own rise in more premium smartphone segments with its newer crop of smartphones, appear to have contributed to the market movement.

The OEM has been expanding in the traditional markets of Huawei and Honor, such as China, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.

You might be interested:  When Was The Samsung A11 Released

It is possible that recent Xiaomi handsets, such as the company’s flagship Mi 11 series, have had a substantial influence on the company’s perception in premium smartphone markets.

While Xiaomi has made significant advances in this area, Samsung’s underwhelming performance with the Galaxy S21 series, along with the absence of new Galaxy Note devices, may have also aided Xiaomi’s entry into regions where it had previously played a significant role.

Here you may find all of the most recent news, breaking news, and Coronavirus news.

Apple Overtakes Samsung as Biggest Smartphone Vendor

Apple may have reclaimed the top spot – at least for the next quarter. Strategic analytics estimates that Apple delivered 70.7 million devices in the fourth quarter of 2019, edging up Samsung’s predicted 68.8 million shipments in the same period. According to a study from Counterpoint Research, Apple sold 72.9 million iPhone devices in the first quarter of this year, compared to Samsung’s 70 million handsets in the same period. According to Strategy Analytics, Apple captured a whopping 19 percent of the worldwide smartphone market share in the fourth quarter, with Samsung collecting 18 percent of the market share.

  • Apple’s success is most likely attributable to the large number of iPhone 11 series devices that have been sold.
  • The iPhone 11 has a similar general style to previous iPhone models, but it has received significant improvements in the camera, which has made it a popular purchase over the last few months, since its arrival in September.
  • This is the company’s best quarter ever.
  • Samsung, on the other hand, saw its profits plummet by 38 percent.
  • “The sustained decline in memory chip pricing, along with weakness in display panels, resulted in a decrease in fourth-quarter profit from a year earlier,” Samsung stated in a press statement.
  • “Of course, the previous quarter just represents a portion of the whole picture.” Samsung shipped far more cellphones than Apple throughout the course of the year.
  • The fact that none of the main smartphone makers is anticipated to achieve similar heights until at least the last quarter of 2020 is also worth noting.

Editors’ Recommendations

  • Is Apple planning to do away with the notch with the iPhone 14? Despite the fact that carriers are blocking Apple’s iCloud Private Relay function, which is not surprising, I’m not persuaded. When it comes to Astell Kern, the border between headphone amplifier and digital music player is blurred. Apple has joined Google in enabling alternate app store payment mechanisms in South Korea
  • This is the first time Apple has done so. Xperia 5 III is a $1,000 flagship smartphone in 2022, featuring hardware from 2021
  • Sony Xperia 5 III is a $1,000 flagship smartphone in 2022

Apple sold more phones than Samsung in a single quarter for the first time since 2016

iPhone 12 Pro Max (iPhone 12 Pro)


  • According to Gartner statistics, Apple sold 80 million iPhones worldwide in the fourth quarter
  • As a result, Apple surpassed Samsung to become the world’s largest smartphone player in a single quarter. According to Apple, the company will increase by 3.3 percent in 2020.

Apple may have taken Samsung by surprise with the release of the new iPhone 12 series, which has received a significant increase. According to the market research firm Gartner, Apple sold more smartphones in a single quarter than Samsung for the first time since the beginning of 2016. This indicates that from the moment Apple debuted the iPhone 7 series, Samsung was ahead of Apple in terms of unit sales and was selling more units than Apple. Global smartphone sales to end users, according to the research organization, were down by 5.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2020, according to the report.

  • The data from Gartner shows that Apple had a market share of almost 20 per cent of phones sold in the fourth quarter, while Samsung had a share of 16.2 per cent in the same period.
  • According to the study, the debut of the 5G-enabled iPhone 12 series assisted the firm in achieving double-digit growth in the fourth quarter of 2020.
  • In terms of total phone sales, Samsung is the market leader with an 18.8 percent market share in 2020, followed by Apple with a 14.8 percent market share.
  • Xiaomi, Oppo, and Vivo, to name a few of the fierce competitors, were up against the South Korean behemoth.
  • Several factors, including increased sales of 5G smartphones and sales of cheaper to midrange smartphones, have mitigated the market drop in the fourth quarter of 2020, according to Gartner’s Anshul Gupta, senior research director.

To read IndiaToday.in’s comprehensive coverage of the coronavirus epidemic, please click here.

The iPhone just crushed Samsung in sales — is it as bad as it seems?

(Photo courtesy of Tom’s Guide.) According to Counterpoint Research, Apple has had a fantastic start to the year 2021. In January, the business issued its list of the 10 best-selling cellphones, with iPhones accounting for six of the top ten spots. Furthermore, just two of the remaining four spots are occupied by Samsung devices: the Galaxy A31 and Galaxy A21S, both of which are low-cost handsets that can be purchased for less than $200 outside of the United States. Apple, on the other hand, has chosen all four of its high-end iPhone 12 models.

  • The greatest iPhones in 2021
  • The longest battery life on a phone in 2021: The cellphones with the longest battery life
  • PLUS: Due to a scarcity of Mini-LED screens, the iPad Pro 2021 is facing a restocking crisis.

Before we get to that, here’s the whole list of candidates. Take note that these sales numbers reflect global sales for January, so it’s completely conceivable that things have changed in the ensuing months. The image is courtesy of Counterpoint Research. For a variety of reasons, while it is undeniable that Apple’s iPhone 12 launch has been a huge success, it is crucial not to get too excited about what the device says about the competition. First and foremost, the numbers involved are insignificant, with even the best-selling iPhone 12 accounting for only 6% of the worldwide market.

  • This chart favors brands such as Apple, which only produces a small number of phones, as opposed to brands like as Samsung, which produces dozens of handsets spanning the Galaxy S, Note, Z, and A series.
  • In January, theiPhone 12family was the most recent major selling flagship to launch, with versions coming on sale in October and November, according to the data collected for the graphic.
  • But at the same time, there are plenty of reasons for Samsung executives to be a bit concerned as well.
  • The sub-$150 handsets are competing against Samsung’s counterparts in countries other than the United States and winning, which is a trend to keep an eye on.
  • What does it say about the competition if it is underperforming while still being the eighth best-selling smartphone in the world?

Otherwise, there might be a lot of pressure on Samsung to deliver with its next major flagship release, the Galaxy Z Fold 3, which is scheduled for release later this year.

Over the course of more than a decade, Alan has written on technology, covering topics ranging from smartphones to drones and everything in between. His comments may be found all over the internet, as well as in the occasional magazine. He was previously the Deputy Editor of the technology website Alphr. When he’s not analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the newest gadget, you’ll most likely find him battling his ever-growing backlog of video games. Alternatively, you might be playing Spelunky for the millionth time.

America Loves Choices. Not in Phones.

This article is a part of the On Tech newsletter series of articles. The following is a compilation of previous columns. The smartphone market in the United States remains stagnant. iPhones and Samsung devices have accounted for more than 70% of all smartphones purchased in the United States this year. According to statistics collected by the research firm IDC for me, smartphone companies other than those two are seeing their sales decline year after year as well. In addition to the United States, many other nations are controlled by some combination of the Coke and Pepsi of smartphones, but analysts informed me that the United States is unusual in that it lacks a comparably strong third or fourth opponent.

  1. The notion that having more options is a positive thing is a cornerstone of American culture.
  2. So, why do we have just two prominent smartphone companies in the United States of America?
  3. Some of them do well in other countries, but not in the United States.
  4. Until recently, the vast majority of Americans purchased razors and mattresses from a small handful of dominating corporations.
  5. I’ll go through the quirks of smartphones in the United States, the advantages and disadvantages of how they operate in our country, and whether or not there will ever be a smartphone Dollar Shave Club.
  6. Globally, Google’s Android operating system powers around 80 percent of smartphones, with Apple accounting for the vast majority of the remaining 20 percent.
  7. Samsung is by far the most popular manufacturer of Android smartphones.

However, in other parts of the world, there is typically greater variety and competition in smartphone buying, with many of the options coming from Chinese manufacturers such as Xiaomi, Oppo, Realme, and (until recently) Huawei.

It’s complex, but I’ll try to explain it in two parts: Wireless service providers in the United States, such as AT T, are in control of which phones are sold in the country, and they are content with the status quo.

Wireless carriers account for over three-quarters of all phone sales in the United States, and they have an excellent relationship with Apple and Samsung.

They may give commissions to salespeople at Verizon stores in order to encourage them to sell their models to potential customers.

This isn’t always a bad thing or out of the ordinary.

Additionally, purchasing a smartphone from a brand we are unfamiliar with is a risk, and many Americans who purchase a new device remain with the smartphone they are accustomed to using.

LG, which has been a consistent No.

Chinese smartphone manufacturers have had a particularly difficult time in the United States in recent years, owing to government restrictions and concerns among U.S.

For the first time in five years, Google is (maybe) putting more effort into marketing its five-year-old Pixel smartphones to wireless carriers, and the corporation has dropped costs to levels that are far lower than equivalent iPhones.

That’s precisely right.) Is it beneficial or detrimental for Americans to have two dominant smartphone manufacturers?

It’s possible that two excellent choices are sufficient.

Americans are also benefiting from a customer war between the major U.S.

(Mobile phone service, on the other hand, is more expensive in the United States than in most other wealthy countries.) What I’m curious about is what new ideas are being stymied as a result of the stagnant smartphone market in the United States.

Casper and its competitors made it possible for people to avoid going to mattress stores, and foam mattresses became extremely popular. What is the equivalent in smartphones that we might be overlooking or overlooking completely?

Before we go …

  • Google wants to collaborate with the Pentagon once more: After three years of employee protests prevented Google from selling technology to the United States military, the corporation is attempting to win a multi-billion-dollar cloud computing deal from the Pentagon, as my colleagues Dai Wakabayashi and Kate Conger write
  • Myanmar’s “information war” on the internet: According to Reuters, the military in Myanmar is used social media to monitor soldiers in order to prevent defections, propagate false charges of election fraud, and criticize residents who are hostile to the military regime. Using Google Street View brings back memories: According to The Observer, a journalist investigates the ways in which Google’s Street View function allows us to get a unique sight of locations and loved ones from our past. In the words of Sirin Kale, “On Street Vision, we have a panoptical view of the universe and all the riddles, non sequiturs, and idiocies that are a part of everyday life,” she writes.
You might be interested:  How To Fix Samsung Refrigerator

Hugs to this

I realize that Halloween was just a few days ago, but I’m a sucker for films of animals gorging themselves on Halloween pumpkins. Here’s a video of several juvenile squirrels burrowing through the insides of pumpkins. On November 18, we will host a virtual event to examine the secrets of creating productive and healthy online communities. Please join us. Learn more about the event and how to book your seat by reading this. Register for this newsletter here if you do not already receive it in your email inbox.

How Apple and Samsung Compare.and Coexist

Apple Inc. (AAPL) has a book value that has never been seen before by a firm of its size. Apple has successfully retained its status as the world’s largest business by market capitalization, having surpassed Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) in the process. The difference in market capitalization between Apple and Microsoft (MSFT), the second-largest corporation in the world, is around $500 billion, which is higher than the market capitalization of several of the most well-known firms in the world. For its part in South Korea, Samsung isn’t so much a firm as it is a galactic thread that dwarfs everything it comes into contact with.

The companies in which Samsung does not participate are few and largely insignificant.

Key Takeaways

  • Apple is the world’s most valuable firm, with a market capitalization of about $3 trillion
  • It is also the most profitable. Samsung is a smaller firm than Apple, but it is one of the most powerful corporations in the world, particularly in South Korea, where it accounts for a significant share of the country’s gross domestic product. Apple’s iPhones account for the lion’s share of the company’s revenue. Despite the fact that Samsung’s smartphones account for the vast majority of its sales, the semiconductor industry accounts for the vast majority of its operational profit.

Phoning It In

As of January 2022, Samsung’s market capitalization was around $443 billion, which is less than a fourth the size of Apple’s. In 2021, Apple will have sold a total of $365 billion worth of phones, laptops, tablets, and other connected gadgets. Sales of $204 billion were recorded by Samsung in the third quarter of the year. Given the fact that Apple and Microsoft have distinct fiscal year ends, this still leaves them a quarter of a sales behind. As we’ll see in the next sections, Samsung Electronics, which we’ll refer to as “Samsung” throughout this essay, is more than just an Asian equivalent to Apple.

If those seem like synonyms, they aren’t exactly the same thing.

Rather than isolated devices, the term “device solutions” refers to semiconductors, integrated circuits, LED panels, hard drives, and other components that work together to form a complete system.

That leaves information technology and mobility, which includes, among other things, the cell phones and tablets that have historically been identified with Samsung, at least in the United States and Canada.

Huge Margin on iPhones

Apple earns the most money off of iPhones and MacBooks than any other product. Despite the fact that smartphones outsell laptops 5.5 to one, the huge margins on the latter make the competition more or less a wash. Samsung’s profit core is more readily apparent than ever before. The company’s operational profit is derived from mobile phones, which account for 21% of total revenue. Despite the fact that Samsung outsells Apple in terms of market share for mobile phones (20 percent vs 14 percent), Apple is content to sell fewer phones than Samsung due to the better profit margins on each phone sold by the latter.

While this is the case, other Samsung divisions have begun to account for a larger proportion of the company’s income in recent quarters.

During the third quarter of 2021, the unit accounted for 36% of total revenue and 64% of operating profit, respectively.

On Store Shelves and in the Courts

Apple and Samsung have had a tumultuous relationship in the past. That disapproval is not without merit, though. Apple filed a lawsuit against Samsung in 2011, claiming that the Galaxy S and Galaxy Tab were unauthorized copies of the iPhone and iPad, respectively. Following that, Samsung filed a countersuit, claiming that Apple had stolen its wireless networking technology. That year, the corporations ended up suing each other a total of half a dozen times, in four different countries on four continents.

In 2018, Apple was victorious in the action, which resulted in Samsung being forced to pay $539 million in damages.

That summer, the firms established a sort of truce, agreeing to dismiss any lawsuits filed outside of the United States while continuing their courts battles within the country, where litigation is seen as a national hobby.

A Symbiotic Relationship?

The fact that the plaintiff and defendant have a collaborative and symbiotic connection distinguishes this case or series of cases from others. Samsung, through its numerous subsidiaries, sells parts for the identical Apple mobile devices that it is accused of illegally duplicating without Apple’s permission. Apple was at one point Samsung’s largest customer for a variety of reasons, some of which were strategic in nature. Because of its size, Apple has the advantage of obtaining first dibs on supplies, allowing it to raise its orders with Samsung during periods of strong demand while leaving smaller competitors to worry about where to get parts.

Those processors, on the other hand, were at their peak many generations ago.

In reality, after years of speculation, Apple eventually confirmed in the summer of 2014 that it was conducting business with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) (TSM).

Despite the fact that Samsung has stopped manufacturing processors for Apple, the company continues to manufacture the screens for the company’s phones and laptops.

The Bottom Line

Apple has grown to such a size that it can function well without Samsung. Samsung, on the other hand, does not have to be an Apple seller in order to succeed. Because they are rivals in the marketplace, they have been able to place life-changing gadgets in the hands of hundreds of thousands of people. They’ve spent vast quantities of money to establish their domination in the halls of justice, and they’ll continue to do so. We can be confident that both firms will continue to innovate for many more decades to come.

Xiaomi is now selling more smartphones than Apple, and Samsung tops the list, according to new data. Here’s how the major smartphone players rank.

  • According to a survey issued Thursday by the International Data Corporation (IDC), Chinese tech startup Xiaomi sold roughly 5 million more smartphones than Apple in the third quarter. Samsung has regained the top-selling position, displacing Huawei, which has struggled to comply with US export regulations. According to the International Data Corporation, global smartphone sales were down 1.3 percent year on year, but economies such as India and Brazil are booming. Samsung sold nearly twice as many phones as Apple, whose sales were hurt by the delay in the release of the iPhone 12
  • And More articles may be found on the Business Insider homepage.

Something is in the process of loading. The Chinese technology company Xiaomi surpassed Apple to become the world’s third-largest seller of smartphones in the third quarter this year, according to a new study released today. According to the International Data Corporation, Xiaomi sold 46.5 million smartphones, roughly 5 million more than Apple, whose sales were hampered by the iPhone 12’s late release. Samsung has regained the top rank, dethroning Huawei, which has had to cope with US penalties in recent months.

Due to the fact that economies have begun to recover from the epidemic and phone sales have soared in countries such as India, Brazil, Indonesia, and Russia, this is a far lesser reduction than the 9 percent loss predicted by IDC.

1 Samsung – 80.4 million

Crystal Cox (Business Insider) contributed to this report. According to the International Data Corporation, Samsung currently accounts for approximately one in every four cellphones sold worldwide. Sales of the South Korean firm nearly doubled in India, the company’s largest market, as a result of high demand for lower-cost models and the company’s M series. Customers in the United States, the company’s second-largest market, preferred the A series, as well as the Note 20 and Note 20 Ultra. Samsung announced Thursday that it had achieved its highest-ever quarterly revenue of $59 billion, but cautioned that increased smartphone competition might have a negative impact on its fourth-quarter sales.

2 Huawei – 51.9 million

The Huawei Mate XS is a smartphone manufactured by Huawei. Isobel Hamilton (Business Insider) has contributed to this article. Huawei fell to second place as a result of Samsung’s outstanding performance. Compared to the same period last year, revenues at the Chinese business decreased 22 percent in the third quarter. In addition, the company sold nearly 30 million fewer phones than rival Samsung. In addition to continuing decreases in worldwide sales, Huawei’s sales in China were down more than 15 percent as a result of US sanctions, according to IDC, which had an impact on the company’s performance in its home market.

3 Xiaomi – 46.5 million

YouTube/MKBHD Xiaomi reported a 42 percent increase in third-quarter revenue, moving it up to third position, which the International Data Corporation attributed to the company’s sustained strong presence in China. According to IDC, the business is increasingly selling phones to clients outside of China as well, with over half of its phones being sold outside of China, with strong growth in India among those markets.

In addition, Xiaomi’s lower-priced phones, such as the Redmi 9 Series, performed well in both India and China, according to IDC research. The corporation currently has a 13.1 percent share of the smartphone industry, according to market research.

4 Apple – 41.6 million

Lisa Eadicicco/Bureau of Business and Industry iPhone sales, on the other hand, fell 10.6 percent year on year, dropping Apple to the world’s fourth-largest smartphone supplier, with 11.8 percent of the market share, according to the company. In the fourth quarter of 2019, the firm led the IDC’s list, accounting for nearly one out of every five worldwide smartphone sales. This represents a significant decline for the United States corporation. According to IDC, the decline is mostly due to the delayed introduction of the iPhone 12, but the company anticipates iPhone sales to increase in the following quarter once the new model is available.

5 Vivo – 31.5 million

According to the International Data Corporation, Vivo smartphones account for around one in every eleven smartphones purchased worldwide. While global sales for the Chinese firm increased by only 4.2 percent year on year, sales of the company’s lower-cost models increased by over 30 percent in the country. Fill out the form below to receive Insider alerts! Keep up with the latest information on the topics that interest you. Subscribe to push notifications to stay up to date. A lightning bolt-shaped symbol is used to represent lightning.

A lightning bolt-shaped symbol is used to represent lightning.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *